On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 09:22:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > @@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ static void unwind_deferred_task_work(struct callback_head *head) > struct unwind_stacktrace trace; > struct unwind_work *work; > u64 cookie; > + int idx; > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!local_read(&info->pending))) > return; > @@ -161,13 +163,15 @@ static void unwind_deferred_task_work(struct callback_head *head) > > cookie = info->id.id; > > - guard(mutex)(&callback_mutex); > - list_for_each_entry(work, &callbacks, list) { > + idx = srcu_read_lock(&unwind_srcu); > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(work, &callbacks, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&unwind_srcu)) { > if (test_bit(work->bit, &info->unwind_mask)) { > work->func(work, &trace, cookie); > clear_bit(work->bit, &info->unwind_mask); > } > } > + srcu_read_unlock(&unwind_srcu, idx); > } Please; something like so: --- a/include/linux/srcu.h +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h @@ -524,4 +524,9 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(srcu, struct srcu_st srcu_read_unlock(_T->lock, _T->idx), int idx) +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(srcu_lite, struct srcu_struct, + _T->idx = srcu_read_lock_lite(_T->lock), + srcu_read_unlock_lite(_T->lock, _T->idx), + int idx) + #endif --- a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c +++ b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void unwind_deferred_task_work(st cookie = info->id.id; - guard(mutex)(&callback_mutex); + guard(srcu_lite)(&unwind_srcu); list_for_each_entry(work, &callbacks, list) { work->func(work, &trace, cookie); }