On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 11:23:12PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Chenghao,
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 1:50 PM Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The bpf_jit_alloc_exec function serves as the core mechanism for BPF
> > memory allocation, invoking execmem_alloc(EXECMEM_BPF, size) to
> > allocate memory. This change explicitly designates the allocation space
> > for EXECMEM_BPF.
> Without this patch, BPF JIT is allocated from MODULES region; with
> this patch, BPF JIT will be allocated from VMALLOC region. However,
> BPF JIT is similar to modules that the target of direct branch
> instruction is limited, so it should also be allocated from the
> MODULES region.
>
> So, it is better to drop this patch.
>
>
> Huacai
Dear Chen,
I understand your technical considerations. Whether to keep or remove
the current patch has no impact on trampoline, so we can drop this
patch.
Chenghao
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch/mm/init.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/mm/init.c b/arch/loongarch/mm/init.c
> > index c3e4586a7..07cedd9ee 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/mm/init.c
> > @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ struct execmem_info __init *execmem_arch_setup(void)
> > .pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL,
> > .alignment = 1,
> > },
> > + [EXECMEM_BPF] = {
> > + .start = VMALLOC_START,
> > + .end = VMALLOC_END,
> > + .pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL,
> > + .alignment = PAGE_SIZE,
> > + },
> > },
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
