Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Avoid warning on unexpected map for tail call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 23:35:09 +0200 you wrote:
> Before handling the tail call in record_func_key(), we check that the
> map is of the expected type and log a verifier error if it isn't. Such
> an error however doesn't indicate anything wrong with the verifier. The
> check for map<>func compatibility is done after record_func_key(), by
> check_map_func_compatibility().
> 
> Therefore, this patch logs the error as a typical reject instead of a
> verifier error.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Avoid warning on unexpected map for tail call
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/032547272eb0
  - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Negative test case for tail call map
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux