Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Avoid putting struct bpf_scc_callchain variables on the stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:33:37PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> Add a 'struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain' field in bpf_verifier_env.
> This way, the previous bpf_scc_callchain local variables can be
> replaced by taking address of env->callchain. This can reduce stack
> usage and fix the following error:
>     kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19921:12: error: stack frame size (1368) exceeds limit (1280) in 'do_check'
>         [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
> 
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>

jirka

> ---
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index 7e459e839f8b..e2c175d608bb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
>  	char tmp_str_buf[TMP_STR_BUF_LEN];
>  	struct bpf_insn insn_buf[INSN_BUF_SIZE];
>  	struct bpf_insn epilogue_buf[INSN_BUF_SIZE];
> +	struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain;
>  	/* array of pointers to bpf_scc_info indexed by SCC id */
>  	struct bpf_scc_info **scc_info;
>  	u32 scc_cnt;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 29faef51065d..b334e6434eb4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -1913,19 +1913,19 @@ static char *format_callchain(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_scc_callc
>   */
>  static int maybe_enter_scc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *st)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain;
> +	struct bpf_scc_callchain *callchain = &env->callchain;
>  	struct bpf_scc_visit *visit;
>  
> -	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, &callchain))
> +	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, callchain))
>  		return 0;
> -	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, &callchain);
> -	visit = visit ?: scc_visit_alloc(env, &callchain);
> +	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, callchain);
> +	visit = visit ?: scc_visit_alloc(env, callchain);
>  	if (!visit)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	if (!visit->entry_state) {
>  		visit->entry_state = st;
>  		if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
> -			verbose(env, "SCC enter %s\n", format_callchain(env, &callchain));
> +			verbose(env, "SCC enter %s\n", format_callchain(env, callchain));
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1938,21 +1938,21 @@ static int propagate_backedges(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_scc_visi
>   */
>  static int maybe_exit_scc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *st)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain;
> +	struct bpf_scc_callchain *callchain = &env->callchain;
>  	struct bpf_scc_visit *visit;
>  
> -	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, &callchain))
> +	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, callchain))
>  		return 0;
> -	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, &callchain);
> +	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, callchain);
>  	if (!visit) {
>  		verifier_bug(env, "scc exit: no visit info for call chain %s",
> -			     format_callchain(env, &callchain));
> +			     format_callchain(env, callchain));
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
>  	if (visit->entry_state != st)
>  		return 0;
>  	if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
> -		verbose(env, "SCC exit %s\n", format_callchain(env, &callchain));
> +		verbose(env, "SCC exit %s\n", format_callchain(env, callchain));
>  	visit->entry_state = NULL;
>  	env->num_backedges -= visit->num_backedges;
>  	visit->num_backedges = 0;
> @@ -1967,22 +1967,22 @@ static int add_scc_backedge(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  			    struct bpf_verifier_state *st,
>  			    struct bpf_scc_backedge *backedge)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain;
> +	struct bpf_scc_callchain *callchain = &env->callchain;
>  	struct bpf_scc_visit *visit;
>  
> -	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, &callchain)) {
> +	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, callchain)) {
>  		verifier_bug(env, "add backedge: no SCC in verification path, insn_idx %d",
>  			     st->insn_idx);
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
> -	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, &callchain);
> +	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, callchain);
>  	if (!visit) {
>  		verifier_bug(env, "add backedge: no visit info for call chain %s",
> -			     format_callchain(env, &callchain));
> +			     format_callchain(env, callchain));
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
>  	if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2)
> -		verbose(env, "SCC backedge %s\n", format_callchain(env, &callchain));
> +		verbose(env, "SCC backedge %s\n", format_callchain(env, callchain));
>  	backedge->next = visit->backedges;
>  	visit->backedges = backedge;
>  	visit->num_backedges++;
> @@ -1998,12 +1998,12 @@ static int add_scc_backedge(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  static bool incomplete_read_marks(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  				  struct bpf_verifier_state *st)
>  {
> -	struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain;
> +	struct bpf_scc_callchain *callchain = &env->callchain;
>  	struct bpf_scc_visit *visit;
>  
> -	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, &callchain))
> +	if (!compute_scc_callchain(env, st, callchain))
>  		return false;
> -	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, &callchain);
> +	visit = scc_visit_lookup(env, callchain);
>  	if (!visit)
>  		return false;
>  	return !!visit->backedges;
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux