On 24/06/2025 17:14, Alan Maguire wrote:
> On 22/05/2025 07:37, Tony Ambardar wrote:
>> I encountered an issue building BTF kernels for 32-bit armhf, where many
>> functions are missing in BTF data:
>>
>> LD vmlinux
>> BTFIDS vmlinux
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol vfs_truncate
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol vfs_fallocate
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu_node
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_pick_any_cpu_node
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_pick_any_cpu
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_kick_cpu
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_exit_bstr
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_move_vtime
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_move
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_insert_vtime
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dsq_insert
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch_vtime_from_dsq
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch_vtime
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_set_vtime
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq_set_slice
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch_from_dsq
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_dispatch
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_destroy_dsq
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_create_dsq
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol scx_bpf_consume
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_throw
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_obj_new_impl
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_lookup_user_key
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_lookup_system_key
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_iter_task_vma_new
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_iter_scx_dsq_new
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_get_kmem_cache
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_dynptr_from_xdp
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_dynptr_from_skb
>> WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_cgroup_from_id
>> NM System.map
>>
>> After further debugging this can be reproduced more simply:
>>
>> $ pahole -J -j --btf_features=decl_tag,consistent_func,decl_tag_kfuncs .tmp_vmlinux_armhf
>> btf_encoder__tag_kfunc: failed to find kfunc 'scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl' in BTF
>> btf_encoder__tag_kfuncs: failed to tag kfunc 'scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl'
>>
>> $ pfunct -Fbtf -E -f scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl .tmp_vmlinux_armhf
>> <nothing>
>>
>> $ pfunct -Fdwarf -E -f scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl .tmp_vmlinux_armhf
>> s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct * p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, bool * is_idle);
>>
>> $ pahole -J -j --btf_features=decl_tag,decl_tag_kfuncs .tmp_vmlinux_armhf
>>
>> $ pfunct -Fbtf -E -f scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl .tmp_vmlinux_armhf
>> bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct * p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags, bool * is_idle);
>>
>> The key things to note are the pahole 'consistent_func' feature and the u64
>> 'wake_flags' parameter vs. arm 32-bit registers. These point to existing
>> code handling arguments larger than register-size, allowing them to be
>> BTF encoded but only if structs.
>>
>> Generalize the code for any argument type larger than register size (i.e.
>> size > cu->addr_size). This should work for integral or aggregate types,
>> and also avoids a bug in the current code where a register-sized struct
>> could be mistaken for larger. Note that zero-sized arguments will still
>> be marked as inconsistent and not encoded.
>>
>> Fixes: a53c58158b76 ("dwarf_loader: Mark functions that do not use expected registers for params")
>> Tested-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> hi Tony,
>
> I'm planning on landing this shortly unless anyone objects; and on that
> topic if anyone has the cycles to test with this patch that would be
> great! I ran it through the work-in-progress BTF comparison in github CI
> and all looks good; see the "Compare functions generated" step in [1].
>
> Thanks!
>
In fact I spoke too soon; there was a bug in the function comparison.
After that was fixed, I reran with this patch; see [1].
It shows that - as expected - functions with 0-sized params are left
out, specifically
< int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx * ctx, io_tw_token_t tw,
int min_events, int max_events);
< int __io_run_local_work_loop(struct llist_node * * node, io_tw_token_t
tw, int events);
We expect this since io_tw_token_t is 0-sized. However on x86_64 it did
show one _extra_ function that I didn't expect:
> int __vxlan_fdb_delete(struct vxlan_dev * vxlan, const unsigned char
* addr, union vxlan_addr ip, __be16 port, __be32 src_vni, __be32 vni,
u32 ifindex, bool swdev_notify);
It's not clear to me why that function was added with this change - I
would have expected it either with or without the change. Any idea why
that might be?
[1]
https://github.com/alan-maguire/dwarves/actions/runs/15872520906/job/44752273776
> Alan
>
> [1] https://github.com/alan-maguire/dwarves/actions/runs/15854137212
>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - Added Tested-by: from Alexis and Alan.
>> - Revert support for encoding 0-sized structs (as v1) after discussion:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/9a41b21f-c0ae-4298-bf95-09d0cdc3f3ab@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> - Inline param__is_wide() and clarify some naming/wording.
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Update to preserve existing behaviour where zero-sized struct params
>> still permit the function to be encoded, as noted by Alan.
>>
>> ---
>> dwarf_loader.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
>> index e1ba7bc..134a76b 100644
>> --- a/dwarf_loader.c
>> +++ b/dwarf_loader.c
>> @@ -2914,23 +2914,9 @@ out:
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool param__is_struct(struct cu *cu, struct tag *tag)
>> +static inline bool param__is_wide(struct cu *cu, struct tag *tag)
>> {
>> - struct tag *type = cu__type(cu, tag->type);
>> -
>> - if (!type)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - switch (type->tag) {
>> - case DW_TAG_structure_type:
>> - return true;
>> - case DW_TAG_const_type:
>> - case DW_TAG_typedef:
>> - /* handle "typedef struct", const parameter */
>> - return param__is_struct(cu, type);
>> - default:
>> - return false;
>> - }
>> + return tag__size(tag, cu) > cu->addr_size;
>> }
>>
>> static int cu__resolve_func_ret_types_optimized(struct cu *cu)
>> @@ -2942,9 +2928,9 @@ static int cu__resolve_func_ret_types_optimized(struct cu *cu)
>> struct tag *tag = pt->entries[i];
>> struct parameter *pos;
>> struct function *fn = tag__function(tag);
>> - bool has_unexpected_reg = false, has_struct_param = false;
>> + bool has_unexpected_reg = false, has_wide_param = false;
>>
>> - /* mark function as optimized if parameter is, or
>> + /* Mark function as optimized if parameter is, or
>> * if parameter does not have a location; at this
>> * point location presence has been marked in
>> * abstract origins for cases where a parameter
>> @@ -2953,10 +2939,11 @@ static int cu__resolve_func_ret_types_optimized(struct cu *cu)
>> *
>> * Also mark functions which, due to optimization,
>> * use an unexpected register for a parameter.
>> - * Exception is functions which have a struct
>> - * as a parameter, as multiple registers may
>> - * be used to represent it, throwing off register
>> - * to parameter mapping.
>> + * Exception is functions with a wide parameter,
>> + * as single register won't be used to represent
>> + * it, throwing off register to parameter mapping.
>> + * Examples include large structs or 64-bit types
>> + * on a 32-bit arch.
>> */
>> ftype__for_each_parameter(&fn->proto, pos) {
>> if (pos->optimized || !pos->has_loc)
>> @@ -2967,11 +2954,11 @@ static int cu__resolve_func_ret_types_optimized(struct cu *cu)
>> }
>> if (has_unexpected_reg) {
>> ftype__for_each_parameter(&fn->proto, pos) {
>> - has_struct_param = param__is_struct(cu, &pos->tag);
>> - if (has_struct_param)
>> + has_wide_param = param__is_wide(cu, &pos->tag);
>> + if (has_wide_param)
>> break;
>> }
>> - if (!has_struct_param)
>> + if (!has_wide_param)
>> fn->proto.unexpected_reg = 1;
>> }
>>
>
>
