Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix cgroup_xattr/read_cgroupfs_xattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/25 2:56 PM, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
On 6/27/25 2:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 2:36 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 6/27/25 2:34 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 2:19 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 6/27/25 12:12 PM, Song Liu wrote:
cgroup_xattr/read_cgroupfs_xattr has two issues:

1. cgroup_xattr/read_cgroupfs_xattr messes up lo without creating a netns
      first. This causes issue with other tests.

      Fix this by using a different hook (lsm.s/file_open) and not messing
      with lo.

2. cgroup_xattr/read_cgroupfs_xattr sets up cgroups without proper
      mount namespaces.

      Fix this by using the existing cgroup helpers. A new helper
      set_cgroup_xattr() is added to set xattr on cgroup files.

Fixes: f4fba2d6d282 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_cgroup_read_xattr")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ CAADnVQ+iqMi2HEj_iH7hsx+XJAsqaMWqSDe4tzcGAnehFWA9Sw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
Changes v1 => v2:
1. Add the second fix above.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250627165831.2979022-1- song@xxxxxxxxxx/
---
    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c  |  21 ++++
    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.h  |   4 +
    .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_xattr.c   | 117 +++ +--------------
    .../selftests/bpf/progs/read_cgroupfs_xattr.c |   4 +-
    4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

Hi Song.

I tried this patch on BPF CI, and it appears it fixes the hanging
failure we've been seeing today on bpf-next and netdev.
I am going to add it to ci/diffs.

Applied to bpf-next already.

CI patches apply to all base branches. My understanding is, it's needed
at least for netdev too.

How is that possible?

The offending commit is only in /master and in /for-next branches,
while /for-next is there for linux-next only.

I am not sure.

I compared CI logs between bpf-next and netdev runs that both were
cancelled due to 100min job timeout, and they are very similar.

netdev: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/15932863319/ job/44946276955 bpf-next: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/ runs/15934258609/job/44950981852

So the root cause is likely the same.

And most recent netdev (with this patch applied) is green:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/15936292169

CC Jakub



Apparently offending patches were merged by Christian Brauner:

https://github.com/linux-netdev/testing-bpf-ci/commit/13b0cce9e294f8ddf228b9db3e01d76ac29872f2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux