Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_dynptr_memset()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/24/25 21:52, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
Add tests to verify the behavior of bpf_dynptr_memset():
   * normal memset 0
   * normal memset non-0
   * memset with an offset
   * memset in dynptr that was adjusted
   * error: size overflow
   * error: offset+size overflow
   * error: readonly dynptr
   * memset into non-linear xdp dynptr

Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@xxxxxxxx>
---
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c |   8 +
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c      | 164 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 172 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
index 62e7ec775f24..f2b65398afce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c
@@ -21,6 +21,14 @@ static struct {
  	{"test_dynptr_data", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
  	{"test_dynptr_copy", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
  	{"test_dynptr_copy_xdp", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_zero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_notzero", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_overflow", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
+	{"test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks", SETUP_XDP_PROG},
  	{"test_ringbuf", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP},
  	{"test_skb_readonly", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
  	{"test_dynptr_skb_data", SETUP_SKB_PROG},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
index a0391f9da2d4..61d9ae2c6a52 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_success.c
@@ -681,6 +681,170 @@ int test_dynptr_copy_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp)
  	return XDP_DROP;
  }
+char memset_zero_data[] = "data to be zeroed";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero(void *ctx)
+{
+	__u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_data);
+	char zeroes[32] = {'\0'};
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, 0);
+	err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(zeroes, memset_zero_data, data_sz);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#define DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL 42
+
+char memset_notzero_data[] = "data to be overwritten";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_notzero(void *ctx)
+{
+	u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_notzero_data);
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+	char expected[32];
+
+	__builtin_memset(expected, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, data_sz);
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_notzero_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
+	err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_notzero_data, data_sz);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_zero_offset_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero_offset(void *ctx)
+{
+	char expected[] = "data to \0\0\0\0eroed partially";
+	__u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_offset_data);
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 8, 4, 0);
+	err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_offset_data, data_sz);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_zero_adjusted_data[] = "data to be zeroed partially";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_zero_adjusted(void *ctx)
+{
+	char expected[] = "data\0\0\0\0be zeroed partially";
+	__u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_zero_adjusted_data);
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_adjust(&ptr, 4, 8);
+	err = err ?: bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
+	err = err ?: bpf_memcmp(expected, memset_zero_adjusted_data, data_sz);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char memset_overflow_data[] = "memset overflow data";
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_overflow(void *ctx)
+{
+	__u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, data_sz + 1, 0);
+	if (ret != -E2BIG)
+		err = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+int test_dynptr_memset_overflow_offset(void *ctx)
+{
+	__u32 data_sz = sizeof(memset_overflow_data);
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_mem(memset_overflow_data, data_sz, 0, &ptr);
+	ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 1, data_sz, 0);
+	if (ret != -E2BIG)
+		err = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?cgroup_skb/egress")
+int test_dynptr_memset_readonly(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_from_skb(skb, 0, &ptr);
+
+	/* cgroup skbs are read only, memset should fail */
+	ret = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr, 0, bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr), 0);
+	if (ret != -EINVAL)
+		err = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("xdp")
+int test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks(struct xdp_md *xdp)
+{
+	const int max_chunks = 200;
+	struct bpf_dynptr ptr_xdp;
+	u32 data_sz, offset = 0;
+	char expected_buf[32];
nit: expected_buf[32] = {DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL};
+	char buf[32];
+	int i;
+
+	__builtin_memset(expected_buf, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL, sizeof(expected_buf));
+
+	/* ptr_xdp is backed by non-contiguous memory */
+	bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(xdp, 0, &ptr_xdp);
+	data_sz = bpf_dynptr_size(&ptr_xdp);
+
+	err = bpf_dynptr_memset(&ptr_xdp, 0, data_sz, DYNPTR_MEMSET_VAL);
+	if (err)
+		goto out;
+
Maybe we can calculate max_chunks instead of hardcoding, something like:
max_chunks = data_sz / sizeof(expected_buf) + (data_sz % sizeof(expected_buf) ? 1 : 0);
+	bpf_for(i, 0, max_chunks) {
+		offset = i * sizeof(buf);
+		err = bpf_dynptr_read(&buf, sizeof(buf), &ptr_xdp, offset, 0);

handle_tail seems unnecessary, maybe handle tail in the main loop:
__u32 sz = min_t(data_sz - offset : sizeof(buf));
bpf_dynptr_read(&buf, sz, &ptr_xdp, offset, 0);

+		switch (err) {
+		case 0:
+			break;
+		case -E2BIG:
+			goto handle_tail;
+		default:
+			goto out;
+		}
+		err = bpf_memcmp(buf, expected_buf, sizeof(buf));
+		if (err)
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+handle_tail:
+	if (data_sz - offset < sizeof(buf)) {
+		err = bpf_dynptr_read(&buf, data_sz - offset, &ptr_xdp, offset, 0);
+		if (err)
+			goto out;
+		err = bpf_memcmp(buf, expected_buf, data_sz - offset);
+	}
+out:
+	return XDP_DROP;
+}
+
  void *user_ptr;
  /* Contains the copy of the data pointed by user_ptr.
   * Size 384 to make it not fit into a single kernel chunk when copying





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux