On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 7:46 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 在 2025/6/20 01:17, Alexei Starovoitov 写道: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 8:44 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Show kprobe_multi link info with fdinfo, the info as follows: > >> > >> link_type: kprobe_multi > >> link_id: 1 > >> prog_tag: a15b7646cb7f3322 > >> prog_id: 21 > >> type: kprobe_multi > > > > .. > > > >> + seq_printf(seq, > >> + "type:\t%s\n" > >> + "kprobe_cnt:\t%u\n" > >> + "missed:\t%lu\n", > >> + kmulti_link->flags == BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ? "kretprobe_multi" : > >> + "kprobe_multi", > > > > why print the same info twice ? > > seq_printf(m, "link_type:\t%s\n", bpf_link_type_strs[type]); > > in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() already did it in a cleaner way. > > > > link_type only shows 'kprobe_multi', maybe we can show the format like: Ohh. Especially so. It would be wrong and confusing to display: link_type: kprobe_multi type: kretprobe_multi Let's fix 'link_type' to display it properly.