From: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:56:55 -0700 > On 6/17/2025 2:18 AM, Thomas Fourier wrote: >> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper >> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. >> >> >> The `ionic_tx_map_frag()` wrapper function is used which returns 0 or a >> valid DMA address. Testing that pointer with `dma_mapping_error()`could >> be eroneous since the error value exptected by `dma_mapping_error()` is >> not 0 but `DMA_MAPPING_ERROR` which is often ~0. >> >> Fixes: ac8813c0ab7d ("ionic: convert Rx queue buffers to use page_pool") >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_txrx.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_txrx.c b/ >> drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_txrx.c >> index 2ac59564ded1..beefdc43013e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_txrx.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_txrx.c >> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int ionic_xdp_post_frame(struct ionic_queue >> *q, struct xdp_frame *frame, >> } else { >> dma_addr = ionic_tx_map_frag(q, frag, 0, >> >> skb_frag_size(frag)); >> - if (dma_mapping_error(q->dev, >> dma_addr)) { >> + if (!dma_addr) { > > Thanks for the fix. > > After looking at this and Olek's comment, I think it makes the most > sense to return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR from ionic_tx_map_frag() and > ionic_tx_map_single() instead of 0 on failures. > > Then any callers would do the following check: > > if (unlikely(dma_addr == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR)) > /* failure path */ > > Another option is always returning dma_addr regardless of success/ > failure from the ionic_tx_map* functions, but then I'd be inclined to > use dma_mapping_error() again in the caller. This approach seems wrong > to me, especially when CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG is enabled. Yup, I'd agree that dma_mapping_error() should be used only for checking return values of the generic DMA API functions and only once per one mapping. Otherwise, it's fine to pass DMA_MAPPING_ERROR and test against it directly (after dma_mapping_error() was called already). > > Thanks, > > Brett Thanks, Olek