On 25/06/18 04:04AM, Eduard Zingerman wrote: > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 08:59 +0000, Anton Protopopov wrote: > > Tests are split in two parts. > > > > The `bpf_insn_set_ops` test checks that the map is managed properly: > > > > * Incorrect instruction indexes are rejected > > * Non-sorted and non-unique indexes are rejected > > * Unfrozen maps are not accepted > > * Two programs can't use the same map > > * BPF progs can't operate the map > > > > The `bpf_insn_set_reloc` part validates, as best as it can do it from user > > space, that instructions are relocated properly: > > > > * no relocations => map is the same > > * expected relocations when instructions are added > > * expected relocations when instructions are deleted > > * expected relocations when multiple functions are present > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Nit: term "relocation" is ambiguous, in BPF context first thing that > comes to mind are ELF relocations that allow CO-RE to work. Thanks, agree. I will try to find other words for the desriptions > [...] > >
