On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:15:17AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > Shakeel Butt (4): > > cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated > > cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe > > cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks > > memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi() > > The patches look good to me. How should it be routed? Should I take all > four, just the first three or would it better to route all through -mm? > I would like all four to be together and since most of the code is in cgroup, cgroup tree makes more sense unless Andrew has different opinion. thanks, Shakeel
