Re: [Build Error Report] Implicit Function declaration for bpf-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 7:52 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There exists the following build error for bpf-next tree on LoongArch:
>
>    CC      drivers/acpi/numa/srat.o
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c: In function ‘acpi_parse_cfmws’:
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:467:13: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘numa_add_reserved_memblk’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>    467 |         if (numa_add_reserved_memblk(node, start, end) < 0) {
>        |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:203: drivers/acpi/numa/srat.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:470: drivers/acpi/numa] Error 2
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:470: drivers/acpi] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:470: drivers] Error 2
>
> This is because the following two commits are not in bpf-next tree:
>
>    commit 9559d5806319 ("LoongArch: Increase max supported CPUs up to 2048")
>    commit a24f2fb70cb6 ("LoongArch: Introduce the numa_memblks conversion")
>
> Is it possible to update bpf-next tree based on 6.16-rc1 or at least
> apply the above two commits to avoid the build error?

perf_event-s are broken in Linus's tree. There is a fix in tip.git.
We're waiting for the fix to land through.
Then we will merge perf_event fix and all other fixes into bpf and bpf-next.
Hopefully in a day or two.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux