Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] bpf: Do not include stack ptr register in precision backtracking bookkeeping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 23 May 2025 21:13:35 -0700 you wrote:
> Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears
> in kernel dmesg:
>   [   60.643604] verifier backtracking bug
>   [   60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
>   [   60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE)
>   [   60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G           OE       6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty #327 PREEMPT(full)
>   [   60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
>   [   60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>   [   60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10
>   [   60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04
>                        01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ...
>   [   60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246
>   [   60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000
>   [   60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
>   [   60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a
>   [   60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8
>   [   60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001
>   [   60.684030] FS:  00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>   [   60.686837] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>   [   60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
>   [   60.691623] Call Trace:
>   [   60.692821]  <TASK>
>   [   60.693960]  ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10
>   [   60.695656]  ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10
>   [   60.697495]  check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0
>   [   60.699237]  do_check+0x58fa/0xab10
>   ...
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v5,1/2] bpf: Do not include stack ptr register in precision backtracking bookkeeping
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e2d2115e56c4
  - [bpf-next,v5,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests with stack ptr register in conditional jmp
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5ffb537e416e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux