RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] net: mana: Add support for Multi Vports on Bare metal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 10:03 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui
> <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paul Rosswurm <paulros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> olaf@xxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ast@xxxxxxxxxx; hawk@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> shradhagupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx; Konstantin
> Taranov <kotaranov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] net: mana: Add support for
> Multi Vports on Bare metal
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 09:20:36AM -0700, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > To support Multi Vports on Bare metal, increase the device config
> response
> > version. And, skip the register HW vport, and register filter steps,
> when
> > the Bare metal hostmode is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >   Updated comments as suggested by ALOK TIWARI.
> >   Fixed the version check.
> >
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 24 ++++++++++++-------
> >  include/net/mana/mana.h                       |  4 +++-
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > index 2bac6be8f6a0..9c58d9e0bbb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ static void mana_pf_deregister_filter(struct
> mana_port_context *apc)
> >
> >  static int mana_query_device_cfg(struct mana_context *ac, u32
> proto_major_ver,
> >  				 u32 proto_minor_ver, u32 proto_micro_ver,
> > -				 u16 *max_num_vports)
> > +				 u16 *max_num_vports, u8 *bm_hostmode)
> >  {
> >  	struct gdma_context *gc = ac->gdma_dev->gdma_context;
> >  	struct mana_query_device_cfg_resp resp = {};
> > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static int mana_query_device_cfg(struct mana_context
> *ac, u32 proto_major_ver,
> >  	mana_gd_init_req_hdr(&req.hdr, MANA_QUERY_DEV_CONFIG,
> >  			     sizeof(req), sizeof(resp));
> >
> > -	req.hdr.resp.msg_version = GDMA_MESSAGE_V2;
> > +	req.hdr.resp.msg_version = GDMA_MESSAGE_V3;
> >
> >  	req.proto_major_ver = proto_major_ver;
> >  	req.proto_minor_ver = proto_minor_ver;
> 
> > @@ -956,11 +956,16 @@ static int mana_query_device_cfg(struct
> mana_context *ac, u32 proto_major_ver,
> >
> >  	*max_num_vports = resp.max_num_vports;
> >
> > -	if (resp.hdr.response.msg_version == GDMA_MESSAGE_V2)
> > +	if (resp.hdr.response.msg_version >= GDMA_MESSAGE_V2)
> >  		gc->adapter_mtu = resp.adapter_mtu;
> >  	else
> >  		gc->adapter_mtu = ETH_FRAME_LEN;
> >
> > +	if (resp.hdr.response.msg_version >= GDMA_MESSAGE_V3)
> > +		*bm_hostmode = resp.bm_hostmode;
> > +	else
> > +		*bm_hostmode = 0;
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Perhaps not strictly related to this patch, but I see
> that mana_verify_resp_hdr() is called a few lines above.
> And that verifies a minimum msg_version. But I do not see
> any verification of the maximum msg_version supported by the code.
> 
> I am concerned about a hypothetical scenario where, say the as yet unknown
> version 5 is sent as the version, and the above behaviour is used, while
> not being correct.
> 
> Could you shed some light on this?
> 

In driver, we specify the expected reply msg version is v3 here:
req.hdr.resp.msg_version = GDMA_MESSAGE_V3;

If the HW side is upgraded, it won't send reply msg version higher
than expected, which may break the driver.

Thanks,
- Haiyang






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux