Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] libbpf: Add bpf_stream_printk() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 01:31, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 10:17 -0700, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> > index a50773d4616e..1a748c21e358 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
>
> [...]
>
> >  /* Use __bpf_printk when bpf_printk call has 3 or fewer fmt args
> > - * Otherwise use __bpf_vprintk
> > + * Otherwise use __bpf_vprintk. Virtualize choices so stream printk
> > + * can override it to bpf_stream_vprintk.
> >   */
> > -#define ___bpf_pick_printk(...) \
> > -     ___bpf_nth(_, ##__VA_ARGS__, __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk,       \
> > -                __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk,          \
> > -                __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_vprintk, __bpf_printk /*3*/, __bpf_printk /*2*/,\
> > -                __bpf_printk /*1*/, __bpf_printk /*0*/)
> > +#define ___bpf_pick_printk(choice, choice_3, ...)                    \
> > +     ___bpf_nth(_, ##__VA_ARGS__, choice, choice, choice,            \
> > +                choice, choice, choice, choice,                      \
> > +                choice, choice, choice_3 /*3*/, choice_3 /*2*/,      \
> > +                choice_3 /*1*/, choice_3 /*0*/)
> >
> >  /* Helper macro to print out debug messages */
> > -#define bpf_printk(fmt, args...) ___bpf_pick_printk(args)(fmt, ##args)
> > +#define __bpf_trace_printk(fmt, args...) \
> > +     ___bpf_pick_printk(__bpf_vprintk, __bpf_printk, args)(fmt, ##args)
> > +#define __bpf_stream_printk(stream, fmt, args...) \
> > +     ___bpf_pick_printk(__bpf_stream_vprintk, __bpf_stream_vprintk, args)(stream, fmt, ##args)
>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                            These two parameters are identical,
>                            why is ___bpf_pick_printk is necessary in such case?

In our case choice and choice_3 are the same, but for bpf_printk
they're different, I was mostly trying to reuse the pick_printk
machinery for both (which dispatches correctly to the actual macro).

> > +
> > +#define bpf_stream_printk(stream, fmt, args...) __bpf_stream_printk(stream, fmt, ##args)
> > +
> > +#define bpf_printk(arg, args...) __bpf_trace_printk(arg, ##args)
> >
> >  struct bpf_iter_num;
> >
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux