Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: Return -EFAULT on misconfigurations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:48, Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Mark these cases as non-recoverable to later prevent them from being
> caught when they occur during speculative path verification.
>
> Eduard writes [1]:
>
>   The only pace I'm aware of that might act upon specific error code
>   from verifier syscall is libbpf. Looking through libbpf code, it seems
>   that this change does not interfere with libbpf.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/785b4531ce3b44a84059a4feb4ba458c68fce719.camel@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@xxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux