On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 9:01 AM KaFai Wan <mannkafai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add .test_run for tp_btf. Use the .test_run for raw_tp. Hm... so now you'll be able to pass arbitrary values as pointers to kernel structs (e.g., arbitrary u64 as struct task_struct * pointer), not sure this is a good idea... > > Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <mannkafai@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/bpf/test_run.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c > index 8cb285187270..8c901ec92341 100644 > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c > @@ -690,6 +690,9 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog, > int b = 2, err = -EFAULT; > u32 retval = 0; > > + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) > + return bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp(prog, kattr, uattr); > + > if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size) > return -EINVAL; > > -- > 2.43.0 >
