Re: [PATCH bpf-next] Use thread-safe function pointer in libbpf_print

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/24/25 23:14, > wrote:
From: Jonathan Wiepert <jonathan.wiepert@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch fixes a thread safety bug where libbpf_print uses the
global variable storing the print function pointer rather than the local
variable that had the print function set via __atomic_load_n.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wiepert <jonathan.wiepert@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 56250b5ac5b0..ea97a84460cd 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void libbpf_print(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format, ...)
  	old_errno = errno;
va_start(args, format);
-	__libbpf_pr(level, format, args);
+	print_fn(level, format, args);
  	va_end(args);
errno = old_errno;
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@xxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux