Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fix a few issues in arena_spin_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:41:16AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:32 AM <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:41:24 +0200 you wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried running the arena_spin_lock test on s390x and ran into the
> > > following issues:
> > >
> > > * Changing the header file does not lead to rebuilding the test.
> > > * The checked for number of CPUs and the actually required number of
> > >   CPUs are different.
> > > * Endianness issue in spinlock definition.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock.c build dependency
> >     https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4fe09ff1a54a
> >   - [2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock on systems with less than 16 CPUs
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in __qspinlock declaration
> >     (no matching commit)
> 
> Hmm. Looks like pw-bot had too much influence from AI bots
> and started hallucinating itself :)

I'll look into what happened here.

-K




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux