Hi Jiri,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:44:22PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding man page for new uprobe syscall.
>
> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> man/man2/uprobe.2 | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> man/man2/uretprobe.2 | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 man/man2/uprobe.2
>
> diff --git a/man/man2/uprobe.2 b/man/man2/uprobe.2
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2b01a5ab5f3e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/man/man2/uprobe.2
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +.\" Copyright (C) 2024, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +.\"
> +.\" SPDX-License-Identifier: Linux-man-pages-copyleft
> +.\"
> +.TH uprobe 2 (date) "Linux man-pages (unreleased)"
> +.SH NAME
> +uprobe
> +\-
> +execute pending entry uprobes
> +.SH SYNOPSIS
> +.nf
> +.B int uprobe(void);
> +.fi
> +.SH DESCRIPTION
> +.BR uprobe ()
> +is an alternative to breakpoint instructions
> +for triggering entry uprobe consumers.
What are breakpoint instructions?
> +.P
> +Calls to
> +.BR uprobe ()
> +are only made from the user-space trampoline provided by the kernel.
> +Calls from any other place result in a
> +.BR SIGILL .
> +.SH RETURN VALUE
> +The return value is architecture-specific.
> +.SH ERRORS
> +.TP
> +.B SIGILL
> +.BR uprobe ()
> +was called by a user-space program.
> +.SH VERSIONS
> +The behavior varies across systems.
> +.SH STANDARDS
> +None.
> +.SH HISTORY
> +TBD
> +.P
> +.BR uprobe ()
> +was initially introduced for the x86_64 architecture
> +where it was shown to be faster than breakpoint traps.
> +It might be extended to other architectures.
> +.SH CAVEATS
> +.BR uprobe ()
> +exists only to allow the invocation of entry uprobe consumers.
> +It should
> +.B never
> +be called directly.
> +.SH SEE ALSO
> +.BR uretprobe (2)
The pages are almost identical. Should we document both pages in the
same page?
> diff --git a/man/man2/uretprobe.2 b/man/man2/uretprobe.2
> index bbbfb0c59335..bb8bf4e32e5d 100644
> --- a/man/man2/uretprobe.2
> +++ b/man/man2/uretprobe.2
> @@ -45,3 +45,5 @@ exists only to allow the invocation of return uprobe consumers.
> It should
> .B never
> be called directly.
> +.SH SEE ALSO
> +.BR uprobe (2)
> --
> 2.49.0
How about something like the diff below?
Have a lovely day!
Alex
---
diff --git i/man/man2/uretprobe.2 w/man/man2/uretprobe.2
index bbbfb0c59..df0e5d92e 100644
--- i/man/man2/uretprobe.2
+++ w/man/man2/uretprobe.2
@@ -2,22 +2,28 @@
.\"
.\" SPDX-License-Identifier: Linux-man-pages-copyleft
.\"
-.TH uretprobe 2 (date) "Linux man-pages (unreleased)"
+.TH uprobe 2 (date) "Linux man-pages (unreleased)"
.SH NAME
+uprobe,
uretprobe
\-
-execute pending return uprobes
+execute pending entry or return uprobes
.SH SYNOPSIS
.nf
+.B int uprobe(void);
.B int uretprobe(void);
.fi
.SH DESCRIPTION
+.BR uprobe ()
+is an alternative to breakpoint instructions
+for triggering entry uprobe consumers.
+.P
.BR uretprobe ()
is an alternative to breakpoint instructions
for triggering return uprobe consumers.
.P
Calls to
-.BR uretprobe ()
+these system calls
are only made from the user-space trampoline provided by the kernel.
Calls from any other place result in a
.BR SIGILL .
@@ -26,22 +32,28 @@ .SH RETURN VALUE
.SH ERRORS
.TP
.B SIGILL
-.BR uretprobe ()
-was called by a user-space program.
+These system calls
+were called by a user-space program.
.SH VERSIONS
The behavior varies across systems.
.SH STANDARDS
None.
.SH HISTORY
+.TP
+.BR uprobe ()
+TBD
+.TP
+.BR uretprobe ()
Linux 6.11.
.P
-.BR uretprobe ()
-was initially introduced for the x86_64 architecture
-where it was shown to be faster than breakpoint traps.
-It might be extended to other architectures.
+These system calls
+were initially introduced for the x86_64 architecture
+where they were shown to be faster than breakpoint traps.
+They might be extended to other architectures.
.SH CAVEATS
-.BR uretprobe ()
-exists only to allow the invocation of return uprobe consumers.
-It should
+These system calls
+exist only to allow the invocation of
+entry or return uprobe consumers.
+They should
.B never
be called directly.
$ MANWIDTH=64 diffman-git
--- HEAD:man/man2/uretprobe.2
+++ ./man/man2/uretprobe.2
@@ -1,24 +1,30 @@
-uretprobe(2) System Calls Manual uretprobe(2)
+uprobe(2) System Calls Manual uprobe(2)
NAME
- uretprobe - execute pending return uprobes
+ uprobe, uretprobe - execute pending entry or return up‐
+ robes
SYNOPSIS
+ int uprobe(void);
int uretprobe(void);
DESCRIPTION
+ uprobe() is an alternative to breakpoint instructions
+ for triggering entry uprobe consumers.
+
uretprobe() is an alternative to breakpoint instructions
for triggering return uprobe consumers.
- Calls to uretprobe() are only made from the user‐space
- trampoline provided by the kernel. Calls from any other
- place result in a SIGILL.
+ Calls to these system calls are only made from the user‐
+ space trampoline provided by the kernel. Calls from any
+ other place result in a SIGILL.
RETURN VALUE
The return value is architecture‐specific.
ERRORS
- SIGILL uretprobe() was called by a user‐space program.
+ SIGILL These system calls were called by a user‐space
+ program.
VERSIONS
The behavior varies across systems.
@@ -27,16 +33,20 @@
None.
HISTORY
- Linux 6.11.
+ uprobe()
+ TBD
+
+ uretprobe()
+ Linux 6.11.
- uretprobe() was initially introduced for the x86_64 ar‐
- chitecture where it was shown to be faster than break‐
- point traps. It might be extended to other architec‐
- tures.
+ These system calls were initially introduced for the
+ x86_64 architecture where they were shown to be faster
+ than breakpoint traps. They might be extended to other
+ architectures.
CAVEATS
- uretprobe() exists only to allow the invocation of re‐
- turn uprobe consumers. It should never be called di‐
- rectly.
+ These system calls exist only to allow the invocation of
+ entry or return uprobe consumers. They should never be
+ called directly.
-Linux man‐pages (unreleased) (date) uretprobe(2)
+Linux man‐pages (unreleased) (date) uprobe(2)
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
