On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 1:37 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add 5-byte nop uprobe trigger bench (x86_64 specific) to measure > uprobes/uretprobes on top of nop5 instruction. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 12 ++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_uprobes.sh | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > LGTM. Should we land this benchmark patch through the bpf-next tree? It won't break anything, just will be slower until patch #1 gets into bpf-next as well, which is fine. Ingo or Peter, any objections to me routing this patch separately through bpf-next? But either way: Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> [...]
