On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:34:02PM +0800, Feng Yang wrote:
> From: Feng Yang <yangfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This test verifies that attaching kprobe/kretprobe with long event names
> does not trigger EINVAL errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 5 +++
> .../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> index 9b7f36f39c32..633b5eb4379b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,39 @@ static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void)
> test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
> }
>
> +/* attach kprobe/kretprobe long event name testings */
> +static void test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name(void)
> +{
> + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts);
> + struct bpf_link *kprobe_link, *kretprobe_link;
> + struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel;
> +
> + skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load"))
> + return;
> +
> + /* manual-attach kprobe/kretprobe */
> + kprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY;
> + kprobe_opts.retprobe = false;
> + kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe,
> + "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> + &kprobe_opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe_long_event_name"))
> + goto cleanup;
> + skel->links.handle_kprobe = kprobe_link;
> +
> + kprobe_opts.retprobe = true;
> + kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kretprobe,
> + "bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name",
> + &kprobe_opts);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kretprobe_link, "attach_kretprobe_long_event_name"))
> + goto cleanup;
> + skel->links.handle_kretprobe = kretprobe_link;
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> static void test_attach_probe_auto(struct test_attach_probe *skel)
> {
> struct bpf_link *uprobe_err_link;
> @@ -371,6 +404,8 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
>
> if (test__start_subtest("uprobe-long_name"))
> test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name();
> + if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-long_name"))
> + test_attach_kprobe_long_event_name();
>
> cleanup:
> test_attach_probe__destroy(skel);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> index f38eaf0d35ef..439f6c2b2456 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
> @@ -1053,6 +1053,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
> return args->a;
> }
>
> +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void)
> +{
> +}
does it need to be a kfunc? IIUC it just needs to be a normal kernel/module function
jirka
> +
> BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
> @@ -1093,6 +1097,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABL
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
>
> static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> index b58817938deb..e5b833140418 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> @@ -159,4 +159,6 @@ void bpf_kfunc_trusted_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
> void bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(int *ptr) __ksym;
> void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
>
> +void bpf_kfunc_looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong_name(void) __ksym;
> +
> #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
