Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to access const void pointer argument in tracing program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 01:06:26AM +0800, KaFai Wan wrote:
> Adding verifier test for accessing const void pointer argument in
> tracing programs.
> 
> The test program loads 2nd argument of kfree tp_btf which is
> const void pointer and checks that verifier allows that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_btf_ctx_access.c        | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_btf_ctx_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_btf_ctx_access.c
> index 28b939572cda..a6cec7f73dcd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_btf_ctx_access.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_btf_ctx_access.c
> @@ -65,4 +65,13 @@ __naked void ctx_access_u32_pointer_reject_8(void)
>  "	::: __clobber_all);
>  }
>  
> +SEC("tp_btf/kfree")
> +__description("btf_ctx_access const void pointer accept")
> +int ctx_access_const_void_pointer_accept(void)
> +{
> +	/* load 2nd argument value (const void pointer) */
> +	asm volatile ("r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8); ");

I think we should follow formatting of other tests in the file,
a do smth like:

	asm volatile ("				\
	r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8); ");   /* load 2nd argument value (const void pointer) */\
	...

thanks,
jirka


> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux