On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 7:55 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In v2 of rqspinlock [0], we fixed potential problems with WFE usage in
> arm64 to fallback to a version copied from Ankur's series [1]. This
> logic was moved into arch-specific headers in v3 [2].
>
> However, we missed using the arch-provided res_smp_cond_load_acquire
> in commit ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64")
> due to a rebasing mistake between v2 and v3 of the rqspinlock series.
> Fix the typo to fallback to the arm64 definition as we did in v2.
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250206105435.2159977-18-memxor@xxxxxxxxx
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@xxxxxxxxxx
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250303152305.3195648-9-memxor@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Fixes: ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64")
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h | 2 +-
> kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This one and two other selftest patches were applied.
