On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:36 PM Feng Yang <yangfeng59949@xxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > So the return of bpf_perf_event_read_value_proto can be done through the bpf_base_func_proto function. > bpf_base_func_proto > ...... > case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read_value: > return bpf_get_perf_event_read_value_proto(); > > I think this can be removed. I see. I misunderstood this part because I was reading code before ae0a457f5d33c336f3c4259a258f8b537531a04b. Now it looks good. Acked-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> > > For future patches, please read Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst > > and follow rules for email subject, etc. For example, this patch should > > have a subject like "[PATCH bpf-next] xxx". > > Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will pay attention to it next time. >
