[PATCH 2/3] perf ftrace: Remove an unnecessary condition check in BPF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The bucket_num is set based on the {max,min}_latency already in
cmd_ftrace(), so no need to check it again in BPF.  Also I found
that it didn't pass the max_latency to BPF. :)

No functional changes intended.

Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/func_latency.bpf.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/func_latency.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/func_latency.bpf.c
index 3d3d9f427c20876e..ad70547446786c54 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/func_latency.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/func_latency.bpf.c
@@ -125,8 +125,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(func_end)
 			// than the min latency desired.
 			if (val > 0) { // 1st entry: [ 1 unit .. bucket_range units )
 				key = val / bucket_range + 1;
-				if (key >= bucket_num ||
-					val >= max_latency - min_latency)
+				if (key >= bucket_num)
 					key = bucket_num - 1;
 			}
 
-- 
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux