Re: [PATCH bpf-next v12 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Xing wrote:
> No functional changes here. Only add test to see if the orig_skb
> matches the usage of application SO_TIMESTAMPING.
> 
> In this series, bpf timestamping and previous socket timestamping
> are implemented in the same function __skb_tstamp_tx(). To test
> the socket enables socket timestamping feature, this function
> skb_tstamp_tx_report_so_timestamping() is added.
> 
> In the next patch, another check for bpf timestamping feature
> will be introduced just like the above report function, namely,
> skb_tstamp_tx_report_bpf_timestamping(). Then users will be able
> to know the socket enables either or both of features.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux