On 09/07/2025 02:12, ew kim wrote: > Add soundcard bindings for the abox generic of exynus automotive. This wasn't ever tested, so very short review. You have typos here and there. But more important - this should not be a "generic" thing, but binding for your sound card. What's more important, there is no user of it, so anyway this cannot be accepted as it makes no sense without user. > > Signed-off-by: ew kim <ew.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/sound/samsung,abox-generic.yaml | 77 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/samsung,abox-generic.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/samsung,abox-generic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/samsung,abox-generic.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..bf641a197903 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/samsung,abox-generic.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/samsung/abox-generic.yaml#" > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" But the quality of the patch and lack of testing makes me thinking if you could not get some help inside Samsung in posting a proper patch? Best regards, Krzysztof