Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

[Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx>]

Hello Mark,

The above change is just a 1:1 conversion.
system_wq is a per-cpu wq, so we only converted the name with the new one.
system_wq is still present in the code, for a few release cycles.

If the users don't care to be per-cpu, system_dfl_wq (the new unbound
wq) can be used instead.

This is just the first step of the conversion.

Thanks!


On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:54 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 11:10:16AM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
>
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/aw88081.c
> > @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static void aw88081_start(struct aw88081 *aw88081, bool sync_start)
> >       if (sync_start == AW88081_SYNC_START)
> >               aw88081_start_pa(aw88081);
> >       else
> > -             queue_delayed_work(system_wq,
> > +             queue_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq,
> >                       &aw88081->start_work,
> >                       AW88081_START_WORK_DELAY_MS);
> >  }
>
> I can't tell why you're putting all these onto the percpu workqeue, I
> would be astonished if any of the users cared.



-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product




marco.crivellari@xxxxxxxx