> [adding Daniel to CC] > > Daniel suggested that elsewhere in the thread and of course it's an > > appealing proposition, as it would keep complexity down and unify > > handling across CVM use cases. > > > > However I wonder if changing things would break migration for > > existing SEV(-ES) guests. Yea. I've went the conservative way and created a test build keeping things as-is for SEV(-ES). Just in case, I don't know for sure if there are any failure modes if we switch guests from pflash to bios. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kraxel/edk2.testbuilds/build/9376581/ take care, Gerd
