> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 09:27:33 +0800, liu.xuemei1(a)zte.com.cn wrote: > > The above looks weird. Now 'client' is referenced twice and you delete > an empty line? Since the patch fixes the virStreamEventAddCallback (not freeing its 'opaque'), 'client' should be referenced before every call of it. I thought the second was for virNetServerClientAddFilter and tried to make them more associative. However it seems no matter the second reference exists or not, there is no leak or UAF reported. I'll remove it in next version if I confirm this.
