Re: [PATCH] docs: outline bug expectations wrt automated tools / AI agents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/25 10:52, Daniel P. Berrangé via Devel wrote:
> From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Bug reports from automated tools and AI agents are time consuming


Maybe orthogonal topic, but should we also discourage (if not ban)
people from sending patches generated by AI tools? For instance Gentoo
has done so [1] and their foremost reason is possible licensing problem
/ copyright violation.

I've seen some people asking some language models what does this or that
internal function of ours do (when investigating code). And while I
might have preferences on that, it's probably okay. But letting LLMs
generate pieces of code that was trained on who-knows-what might pose
problem once such code is merged.

OTOH - we have Developer Certificate of Origin which should mean that
the author can send given patch.

1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy

Michal




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux