Re: [PATCH 1/5] virpci: Switch to an implementation using libpciaccess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Anyway, my question is the following:
>
> Should we split this series into two: the virpci part and the bhyve
> part?
> If I'm not mistaken, they are not tied to each other, and splitting
> them would make review easier as the bhyve part is almost ready
> to get it.

If you don't redo virpci, then the bhyve part won't even work.
If you divide the series into two parts, you first need to take virpci, and then bhyve.

-- 
Alexander Shursha



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux