On 14 Sep 2025 at 1:42, Samuel Sieb wrote: Date sent: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 01:42:18 -0700 Subject: Re: Recently found that new Kernel would not install because not enough space in /boot. To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On 9/13/25 7:39 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > On local 3 notebooks, was able to to remove oldest kernel using > > dnf, and modifying the dnf.conf to only allow 2 kernels. > > Then the install went thru ok. > > On one I shifted / partition over 512M and expanded /boot to make > > it 1.5G now. > > I've got 5 other machines that are 7 timezones away, and did same > > process to get them to be able to install new kernels. > > > > Current notebook has a 1.5G boot so has the 3 kernels and rescue > > kernel. > > /dev/sdb2 1512328 945096 519396 65% /boot > > > > Just looking at img files. > > 180141088 Sep 6 04:19 initramfs-6.16.4-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 180182306 Sep 10 02:56 initramfs-6.16.5-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 180186104 Sep 12 14:14 initramfs-6.16.7-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 278057070 Sep 6 04:21 > > initramfs-0-rescue-5454d68084c145e496d5ce383b5147de.img > > > > Have used dnfup for long time, so not sure if size was changed at > > some point. Just checked a recent install on 2TB system, and it > > shows boot as 1G? > > > > But seeing its img files about 100M smaller than on this one? > > > > 76159287 Sep 5 01:19 initramfs-6.16.4-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 79431805 Sep 9 18:32 initramfs-6.16.5-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 79753328 Sep 13 19:33 initramfs-6.16.7-200.fc42.x86_64.img > > 176153063 Sep 1 22:44 > > initramfs-0-rescue-3b8d97eb0c824e69a66569165466fcc9.img > > > > So, not sure why huge difference in sizes? > > There was a dracut change that made the initramfs files bigger. There > is discussion about changing the setting back. Thanks for info. The interesting thing is the machines are both Dell Lattitude 5580 notebooks. Only real difference is that the one with bigger files is an machine that has been updated over a number of versions on a 1TB SSD drive, and the one with smaller files is a recent clean install on a 2TB nvme drive. So, seems strange that each file is about 100M bigger. Found some things compression, but tried it with no difference? cat /etc/dracut.conf.d/custom-compression.conf compress="zstd" rebuild and it stayed the same basic size. Both machines originally had the directory empty? Thanks again for reply. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue +------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@xxxxxxxx mailto:msetzerii@xxxxxxxxx mailto:msetzerii@xxxxxxx Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+ -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
