On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK, Now it is working with Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 enp0s20f0u11 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 bridge0 10.40.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bridge0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 enp0s20f0u11 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 bridge0 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0 Question I have enp1s0 ipv4 manually set as 10.40.1.0/24 without GW, neither DNS enp2s0 ivpv4 also manually set as 10.40.2.0/24 without GW, neither DNS
These should both be unconfigured. They are part of the bridge. And I'm still concerned that 192.168.1.1 is on the bridge.
and enp1s0 port 1 and enp2s0 port 2 set automatic DHCP Should I keep it like that? Will be the IP addresses always conserved?
I don't know what you mean by this. I would recommend that PC B and C have static addresses. I don't think the DHCP reservations are preserved.
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
