On 6/16/25 10:16 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
From the Fedora 41 installation
~]# ld.so --help
[...]
Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:
x86-64-v4
x86-64-v3
x86-64-v2
None of those say "supported, searched" which indicates it
doesn't support x86-64-v2 or newer.
Here is the output from one of my oldests systems:
$ grep -m1 '^model name' /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3630QM CPU @ 2.40GHz
$ ld.so --help | sed -n '/glibc-hwcaps directories/,$p'
Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:
x86-64-v4
x86-64-v3
x86-64-v2 (supported, searched)
This system can't run RHEL-10 containers, which require v3,
for example.
Tangentially, I didn't notice in the original message where
you said the problem was a CentOS 9.4 system going into a
kernel panic. I presume you mean either RHEL/Rocky/Alma
there? Unless it's RHEL, neither Rocky nor Alma support
9.4. The current (and supported) release is 9.6, from a few
weeks ago. 9.4 is somewhere between a year and 6 months
behind in security updates.
It was Alma. Moved to get away from CentOS stream. Would upgrade If it
would run.
System dates from 2007. With f41 running would think the Alma OS would also
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
