On Sun Jun15'25 09:30:27PM, Marco Moock wrote: > From: Marco Moock <mm@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:30:27 +0200 > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: is there a way to disable dnf from ignoring conflicting > requests > > Am 15.06.2025 um 14:25:06 Uhr schrieb Ranjan Maitra via users: > > > BUt I wonder where this different version comes in? Can I specify the > > updated ssl version through the spec file or something else? > > Do more binaries exist that might be the issue? > Hi, Thanks! I do not get this at all. The spec file when it gets made is saying: Requires: libPropList.so.0()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.33)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.34)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libcompface.so.1()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit) libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Where does this lissl.so.1.1 get pulled in from? Best wishes, Ranjan -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
