On 6/13/25 6:55 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/13/25 5:51 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 6/13/25 3:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Open SUSE pulled a "NOTTRUSTED".
[...]
2) if so, what is the workaround?
# dnf install waterfox-6.5.9-4.1.x86_64.rpm
Not sure why you're installing it manually to be honest.
$ dnf provides waterfox
Updating and loading repositories:
WineHQ packages 100% | 10.5 KiB/s | 2.6 KiB |
00m00s
virtio-win builds roughly matching wha 100% | 1.9 KiB/s | 1.8 KiB |
00m01s
Repositories loaded.
No matches found. If searching for a file, try specifying the full path or
using a wildcard prefix ("*/") at the beginning.
Without listing the repos you have and the contents of the
waterfox repo, how does this tell us anything useful? :/
We already know that it is in a third-party repo in the
opeunSUSE Build Service, so I would expect that you have it
enabled. If you don't for some reason, then why you don't
might be relevant. Having to guess at things just makes
this a painful process (and makes me wonder why I bother).
I can only guess that your earlier 'Open SUSE pulled a
"NOTTRUSTED".' comment is related, but I showed that it
worked fine for in a Fedora 41 container and even tried to
provide some details as to why you might have gotten
whatever failures you got. You didn't respond to any of
those details nor provide any further information about the
actual failures you had.
It would be much better for everyone if you provided more
actual details.
Here, again and in more detail, are the steps I took in a
Fedora 41 container which show that adding the third-party
waterfox repo and installing waterfox work as expected.
I am not trying to imply anything about whether this is a
trusted repo or not. I have no interest in running waterfox
myself, so I don't need to evaluate whether I want to get
the package from this repo or not. That's for you to
decide.
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf repolist
repo id repo name
fedora Fedora 41 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 41 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
updates Fedora 41 - x86_64 - Updates
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]#
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf config-manager addrepo --from-repofile=https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:hawkeye116477:waterfox/Fedora_41/home:hawkeye116477:waterfox.repo
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf repolist
repo id repo name
fedora Fedora 41 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 41 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
updates Fedora 41 - x86_64 - Updates
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]#
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/home\:hawkeye116477\:waterfox.repo
[home_hawkeye116477_waterfox]
name=Waterfox (deb/pkg.tar.xz/rpm/AppImage) (Fedora_41)
type=rpm-md
baseurl=https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/hawkeye116477:/waterfox/Fedora_41/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/hawkeye116477:/waterfox/Fedora_41/repodata/repomd.xml.key
enabled=1
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf list waterfox
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Available packages
waterfox.src 6.5.9-4.1 home_hawkeye116477_waterfox
waterfox.x86_64 6.5.9-4.1 home_hawkeye116477_waterfox
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf install -y waterfox
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Package Arch Version Repository Size
Installing:
waterfox x86_64 6.5.9-4.1 home_hawkeye116477_waterfox 242.9 MiB
Installing dependencies:
...
Importing OpenPGP key 0x625A271E:
UserID : "home:hawkeye116477 OBS Project <home:hawkeye116477@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
Fingerprint: E64C7A04DC653D07ACA3EA585E62D791625A271E
From : https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/hawkeye116477:/waterfox/Fedora_41/repodata/repomd.xml.key
The key was successfully imported.
...
Complete!
[root@925e6b05d9f9 /]# dnf list --installed waterfox
Installed packages
waterfox.x86_64 6.5.9-4.1 home_hawkeye116477_waterfox
Hopefully, you'll read that carefully and if any of the
commands are unclear you can check the documentation for
them, then get back to us with specific questions about the
command and/or how and where things went wrong for you,
showing the steps you took, the output you got, and why it
may differ from what you expect. Don't make us guess,
please.
Hi Todd,
And thank you for all your assistance.
All the information necessary to assist me with my question
was provided in my initial post and subsequent posts.
Somewhere you got lost or confused. Would you like me
to go over each of your points above and explain what you
missed point by point?
-T
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
