Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > Thank you to both! > > OK, dealing with the pam first, here is the problem. > >> >>> Another point: /etc/pam.d/slim uses pam_console.so that is not >>> provided (any more ?) on F42. >> >> The pam_console.so was removed from pam in Fedora 39: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemovePamConsole >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2166692 >> >> The change page even has a link to slim as a dependency: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1822229 >> >> That was automatically closed as WONTFIX because it was >> reported in 2020, during the Fedora 33 cycle. :) >> >> Since it's working in Fedora 41, I would take that as sign >> that dropping that from the slim.pam in the Fedora package >> won't do any harm and will avoid the warning. > > So, dropping pam, with -DUSEPAM=no, there seems to be a problem in the compilation: I don't think you want to drop pam support. Just remove the pam_console.so line from slim.pam in the Fedora package source. It is only that module which was removed. In other words: diff --git i/slim.pam w/slim.pam index e42aba2..f0cd831 100644 --- i/slim.pam +++ w/slim.pam @@ -8,5 +8,4 @@ session optional pam_keyinit.so force revoke session include system-auth session required pam_selinux.so close session required pam_loginuid.so -session optional pam_console.so session required pam_selinux.so open -- Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
