On 5/6/25 11:16 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/6/25 2:20 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 20:29 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/4/25 3:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have two servers affected by:
restore: <name unknown>: ftruncate: Invalid argument
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295
This is pretty critical to me. And pretty much anyone
using dump/restore. The maintainer seems to be ignoring
this.
Is there an ext4 sub for dump/restore that is maintained by
the repo?
Many thanks,
-T
This caught my attention: the ability to mount
the archive in your file system
https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/usage/mount.html#
Anyone have any experience with it?
Yes, though I don't generally do that. My backup medium is a pair of
mirrored hard-drives (using BTRFS) on an external USB enclosure and I
prefer to leave it offline except when needed. I have some scripts to
mount/unmount as required.
poc
The ability to recover with a standard file manager is
way, way up there on my list!
If you use btrfs, you can easily do differential (but full) backups
whenever you want. And they are directly mountable and restorable.
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
