On Sat, 3 May 2025 at 15:04, Terry Polzin <foxec208@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And can you state which plugin? Which checksum? Can you see where it's trying to fetch that from in the logs and verify the upstream artefact exists?I fear this may be a maintainer issue, if there is a table of checksums someplace perhaps it did not get updated correctly in 3.25-2
Potentially, from a quick skim it seems these plugins are proprietary binaries. I don't know if the checksums are maintained upstream or in the hplip package, but upstream would make more sense.
Try running `hp-setup` with the `-g` option for additional debug info, or `-lerror`.
You haven't stated the actual error, but I've just run hp-plugin myself and see the problem:
error: /home/wmcdonald/.hplip/hplip-3.25.2-plugin.run file does not match its checksum. File may have been corrupted or altered
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=6564169#post6564169 indicates a change in the plugin format, obviously the tooling hasn't caught up with that change. The workaround for now is to download the plugin package, unzip and then point hp-setup or hp-plugin at the expanded archive.
I'll raise a BZ against this just to the maintainer's aware.
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue