On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 1:57 AM Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/10/25 6:58 PM, home user via users wrote: > > So I tried "dnf upgrade kernel-devel"... > > > > ----- > > > > Package Arch Version Repository Size > > Installing: > > kernel-devel x86_64 6.13.9-100.fc40 updates 77.7 MiB > > > > Transaction Summary: > > Installing: 1 package > > ----- > > > > It upgraded, but I need fc41, not fc40. > > > > "uname -a" did report that I was using fc41. > > Was it you or someone else that got into this same situation recently? I was the someone else. I had a failed F41 upgrade on an old Proliant G5. It was the first failed upgrade I have personally experienced. The hint about Python or Perl symlinks was correct. But after changing symlinks the machine had other problems. So I did a fresh install on new hardware, and restored the webserver files from backup. > What does "rpm -q fedora-release" show you? > > You can try "dnf upgrade --releasever=41 kernel-devel" for now. Jeff -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
