On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:12 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2025-04-26 at 18:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini via legal wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 12:12 AM Sérgio Basto via legal > > <legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > why LicenseRef-Callaway-CC-BY-SA, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD , > > > LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT , LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL are not valid > > > for > > > license-validate command anh what is need to validate > > > > > > marker ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362370#c2 ) > > > ? > > > > As far as I know, these LicenseRef identifiers were only introduced > > by > > automatic conversions to SPDX for existing packages. > > > > So new packages shouldn't use them. Instead, check and verify which > > actual SPDX identifiers apply to the package, and replace them. > > > > Thank you for the answer , I though the identifier LicenseRef-Callaway > refers to a custom or specific license but in practice is the License > specified Yes - but using the *old* identifiers, which are not identical to the new ones ... Which is why you need to re-review the sources and choose the *actual* matching *new* identifier. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
