From: Jarod Wilson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3870#note_2547467456 Okay, now I'm more curious. I pulled down the MR, rebased it on latest os- build, and reverted most of the `:=` to `=` changes, and everything seems to behave as expected. Here's what I've applied (or unapplied, as the case may be): ```diff diff --git i/redhat/Makefile w/redhat/Makefile index 240a01b127d54..d14279ca06913 100644 --- i/redhat/Makefile +++ w/redhat/Makefile @@ -70,13 +70,13 @@ ARCHCONFIG := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/x86_64/X86_64/ \ -e s/s390x/S390/ -e s/ppc.*/PPC/ ) # rpm information -SPECFILE=$(SPECPACKAGE_NAME).spec +SPECFILE:=$(SPECPACKAGE_NAME).spec RPM:=$(REDHAT)/rpm SRPMS:=$(RPM)/SRPMS SOURCES:=$(RPM)/SOURCES TESTPATCH:=$(REDHAT)/linux-kernel-test.patch CHANGELOG_EXT:=changelog-$(RHEL_MAJOR).$(RHEL_MINOR) -SPECCHANGELOG=$(SPECPACKAGE_NAME).$(CHANGELOG_EXT) +SPECCHANGELOG:=$(SPECPACKAGE_NAME).$(CHANGELOG_EXT) ARCH_LIST=aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 riscv64 # save some user selectable values to know later if we can override them @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ else endif BASEVERSION:=$(SPECRPMVERSION)-$(SPECBUILD) RELEASETAG:=$(SPECPACKAGE_NAME)-$(BASEVERSION) -SRPM=$(SRPMS)/$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST).src.rpm +SRPM:=$(SRPMS)/$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST).src.rpm # # This conditional statement is where fedora, centos, and other (aka RHEL) @@ -301,10 +301,10 @@ else ifeq ("$(DISTRO)", "centos") ifndef BUILD_TARGET BUILD_TARGET:=c$(RHEL_MAJOR)s-candidate endif - SPECTARFILE_RELEASE=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) - SPECKABIVERSION=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) - DISTRELEASETAG=$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST) - DISTBASEVERSION=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + SPECTARFILE_RELEASE:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + SPECKABIVERSION:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + DISTRELEASETAG:=$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST) + DISTBASEVERSION:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) PATCHLIST_URL:=none RHPKG_BIN:=centpkg else @@ -324,10 +324,10 @@ else SPECTARFILE_RELEASE:=$(BASEVERSION) SPECKABIVERSION:=$(BASEVERSION) else - DISTRELEASETAG=$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST) - DISTBASEVERSION=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) - SPECTARFILE_RELEASE=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) - SPECKABIVERSION=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + DISTRELEASETAG:=$(RELEASETAG)$(DIST) + DISTBASEVERSION:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + SPECTARFILE_RELEASE:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) + SPECKABIVERSION:=$(BASEVERSION)$(DIST) endif PATCHLIST_URL:=none RHPKG_BIN:=rhpkg @@ -366,8 +366,8 @@ ifeq ($(AUTOMOTIVE_BUILD), 1) FLAVOR:=rhel endif -TARFILE=linux-$(SPECTARFILE_RELEASE).tar.xz -TARBALL=$(REDHAT)/$(TARFILE) +TARFILE:=linux-$(SPECTARFILE_RELEASE).tar.xz +TARBALL:=$(REDHAT)/$(TARFILE) KABI_TARBALL:=$(REDHAT)/kernel-abi-stablelists-$(SPECKABIVERSION).tar.xz KABIDW := $(REDHAT)/kabi-dwarf ``` Both `make dist-srpm` and `make AUTOMOTIVE_BUILD=1 DIST=".el10iv" dist-srpm` generate a source rpm in the end that looks sane at a glance, though I've not tried building them. Was the problem later on with the build system or ci pipelines? -- _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
