+1 from me Michal On 4/3/25 07:32, Carl George via infrastructure wrote:
The EPEL Steering Committee has realized that the original plan for EPEL 10 repos will cause some upgrade path problems. This is explained in further detail in this issue: https://pagure.io/epel/issue/324 To address this, we'd like to make some changes to the EPEL 10 portions of the new-updates-sync script and the mirrormanager scanner repo mappings. This is set up already in this pull request: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/2557 I feel like these changes are relatively safe for a freeze break and shouldn't impact Fedora in any way. In the unlikely event this doesn't go as planned, we can roll it back by reverting the pull request. Can I get some +1's for this plan?
-- _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
