Le vendredi 20 juin 2025 à 08:41 +0300, Benson Muite via fonts a écrit : > Hi, > > Am reviewing: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257137 > > the font is under OFL-1.1-RN license, but the conf file is under MIT. > Should the spec file contain > > %global fontlicense OFL-1.1-RFN > %license MIT > %global fontlicenses fonts/LICENSE.txt > > if not, where should the conf file license declaration be made? IMHO the license that matters for the font package is the license of the font files (spec files are often MIT too that’s not a reason to make all Fedora rpms FOO and MIT) You can always trace explicitly the licensing of the fontconfig files with a SPDX declaration within those files <!--SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT--> -- Nicolas Mailhot -- _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list -- fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
